كشكول جعفر الخابوري الاسبوعي

.

Asylum is an ancient judicial concept whereby a person who is persecuted for his political opinions or religious beliefs in his country, which may be protected by another sovereign authority or a foreign country, is given the opportunity to express his views.[1][2][3]

The Egyptians, the Greeks and the Hebrews recognized the right to asylum, or what was known as the protection of the persecuted from legal proceedings. This principle was later adopted by the founding of the Christian Church, which laid down detailed rules for how to obtain protection or asylum.[4] In 511 the Council of Orleans, in the presence of Clovis I, decided that asylum could be granted to any person who sought him if he was directly threatened with death for a reason—such as theft and infidelity—or without cause. In general, everyone has the right to seek and enjoy asylum in other countries, and this was confirmed by the United Nations in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, then the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees in 1951, as well as the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees in 1967. [5] Under these agreements, a refugee is a person who lives outside his country because of fear of persecution for a variety of reasons, including ethnic reasons; sectarian; nationality; Politically religious or because of his participation in certain social activities. It is worth noting here that political asylum should not be confused with the modern refugee law, which deals with the massive influx of people into other countries. Asylum is a right that is specific to the interests of individuals and is provided in each case.
Jaafar Abdul Karim Al-Khabouri

جمعية بصطويصي الثقافيه الدوليه

.

Statements within political intersections with factional references and with multiple utilitarian interests have become self-contradictory due to the state of interactions between the Palestinian forces and factions, the result of which is the state of the destructive division of the Palestinian cause, the absence of a national strategy and a legislative reference that governs Palestinian action. Which is everyone’s reference to set controls for the state of political lawlessness and puts Palestinian national interests in its first priority according to a national plan for how to confront the scheme to liquidate the Palestinian cause. In the forefront of which is confronting Israeli policies and the attempts it includes of bartering Palestinian national rights with conditions to improve living life and improve the economy according to the conditions for the occupier who desires By maintaining its hegemony and consolidating its control over the capabilities of our Palestinian people through the practice of the policy of piracy and the appropriation of Palestinian funds under false and totally unacceptable pretexts, taxes and deduction of dues of prisoners and detainees and negotiating on improving the terms of the Paris Economic Agreement within Israel’s attempts to barter on the national and political rights of the Palestinian people
I did (Jaafar Abdul-Karim Al-Khabouri)